Hi, folks:
The pr is in https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1235 Welcome any comments. Thanks Pierre Yin ________________________________ 发件人: Pierre Yin (Jira) <[email protected]> 发送时间: 2020年1月25日 下午 4:29:00 收件人: [email protected] 主题: [jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3706) ZooKeeper.close() would leak SendThread when the network is broken Pierre Yin created ZOOKEEPER-3706: ------------------------------------- Summary: ZooKeeper.close() would leak SendThread when the network is broken Key: ZOOKEEPER-3706 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3706 Project: ZooKeeper Issue Type: Bug Components: java client Affects Versions: 3.5.6, 3.4.14, 3.6.0 Reporter: Pierre Yin The close method of ZooKeeper may cause the leak of SendThread when the network is broken. When the network is broken, the SendThread of ZooKeeper client falls into the continuous reconnecting scenario. But there is an unsafe point which is just at the moment before startConnect() during the continuous reconnecting. If SendThread.close() in another thread hit the unsafe point, startConnect() would sleep some time and force to change state to States.CONNECTING although SendThread.close() already set state to States.CLOSED. In this case, the SendThread would be never be dead and nobody would change the state again. In normal case, ZooKeeper.close() would be blocked forever to wait closeSession packet is finished until the network broken is recovered. But if user set the request timeout, ZooKeeper.close() would break the block waiting within timeout and invoke SendThread.close() to change state to CLOSED. That's why SendThread.close() can hit the unsafe point. Set request timeout is a very common practice. I propose a patch and send it out later. Maybe someone can help to review it. Thanks -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
