Il giorno mer 4 mar 2020 alle ore 17:23 Patrick Hunt
<[email protected]> ha scritto:
>
> It seems like we should have a stated/communicated policy around release
> lifecycles before sending an EOL message. That way folks have some runway
> to plan for the event, both near term (3.4) as well as long term.

Shall we set a deadline ?
Something like "3.4 will be EOL by the end of 2020" ?
At this point we are only "discussing" about sending 3.4 to EOL, no
decision has been made yet


Enrico


>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:16 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Also a minor thing to consider: we wanted to ask the HBase community to
> > upgrade to ZooKeeper 3.5 before, and the conclusion there was that they
> > will do so only when the EOL will be at least scheduled / announced on the
> > ZooKeeper 3.4 versions. Maybe there are other ZooKeeper users as well who
> > will not upgrade until they get 'an official' statement about the 3.4
> > versions.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jordan Zimmerman <
> > [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm +1 on this. We're planning to drop support for 3.4.x in the next
> > > release of Apache Curator, FYI.
> > >
> > > -Jordan
> > >
> > > > On Mar 4, 2020, at 7:36 AM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > we are releasing 3.6.0 (I am waiting for mirrors to sync before
> > > > updating the website).
> > > >
> > > > In my opinion it is time to officially send 3.4 branch to EOL status,
> > > that is:
> > > > - we are not expecting new releases
> > > > - drop 3.4 from download area (it will stay on archives as usual)
> > > > - strongly encourage people to update to 3.5/3.6
> > > >
> > > > 3.4 is far away from master branch and even from 3.6.
> > > > There is a clean upgrade path from 3.4.LATEST to 3.5.7 and to 3.6 so
> > > > users are able to upgrade.
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure we need a VOTE, if we simply agree I can drop 3.4 from
> > > > the "dist" are as long as I push the new website.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Enrico
> > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to