Oh, I see now.

SensitivityWatchEventModifier has been removed by this patch:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1269

Which will make file change event notification slower and tests to break. On 
Mac.
Looks like I only need to increase the timeout, because the polling mechanism 
happens every 10 seconds.

I’ll put together a patch and continue my testing.

Andor




> On 2020. Apr 30., at 11:19, Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> FileChangeWatcherTest keeps failing for me on Mac with the following error:
> 
> [ERROR] Tests run: 5, Failures: 5, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
> 29.233 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.zookeeper.common.FileChangeWatcherTest
> [ERROR] 
> testCallbackWorksOnFileChanges(org.apache.zookeeper.common.FileChangeWatcherTest)
>   Time elapsed: 4.068 s  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: Wrong number of events expected:<1> but was:<0>
>        at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.common.FileChangeWatcherTest.testCallbackWorksOnFileChanges(FileChangeWatcherTest.java:92)
> 
> 
> Andor
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 2020. Apr 27., at 17:24, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> verified checksums, sigs
>> run all tests on Fedora 31 + JDK8
>> checked rat, checkstyle, spotbugs
>> performed basic tests using JDK8 using the staged binaries.
>> 
>> 
>> Generally I don't like to self-vote, I have prepared the RC so I may be
>> biased.
>> 
>> Any other binding +1 would be very appreciated.
>> btw we need another one (we only have me and Patrick as binding voters in
>> this thread)
>> 
>> Enrico
>> 
>> 
>> Il giorno sab 25 apr 2020 alle ore 18:09 Enrico Olivelli <
>> eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> 
>>> We still need a couple of binding VOTEs
>>> Please any PMC check this candidate
>>> 
>>> Enrico
>>> 
>>> Il Ven 24 Apr 2020, 06:31 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:20 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Il giorno mer 22 apr 2020 alle ore 16:14 Norbert Kalmar
>>>>> <nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid> ha scritto:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Only thing I found is that the bin has netty-codec-4.1.49 license file
>>>>>> while the jar included is 4.1.48. I think the license version has a
>>>> typo
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the bugfix version. Not sure if it's a showstopper.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't consider it a showstopper.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you have time to send a fix please ?
>>>>> This way if we have to roll out a new RC we can pick it up.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry - my bad on that one.
>>>> 
>>>> I submitted a simple PR to fix it if you want to pull into the other
>>>> branches or have it ready if a respin is necessary:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1333
>>>> 
>>>> Patrick
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> We could anyhow update to 4.1.49.Final
>>>>> https://netty.io/news/2020/04/22/4-1-49-Final.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Enrico
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Otherwise LGTM:
>>>>>> - Signatures OK
>>>>>> - Compared to git and 3.6.0
>>>>>> - Compiled both on Mac (without C client) and Linux (with C client)
>>>>>> - Run tests (from src) and server (from src and bin tarball), connect
>>>>> with
>>>>>> client and run simple commands
>>>>>> - Spotbugs and checkstyle passed
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Norbert
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:50 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté <
>>>>>> szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.3 using
>>>>> OpenJDK
>>>>>>> 8u242 and maven 3.6.0.
>>>>>>> - all the unit tests passed (both Java and C-client).
>>>>>>> - I also built and executed unit tests for zkpython
>>>>>>> - checkstyle and spotbugs passed
>>>>>>> - apache-rat passed
>>>>>>> - fatjar built
>>>>>>> - I executed a quick rolling-upgrade test from 3.5.7 to 3.6.1.
>>>> (using
>>>>>>> https://github.com/symat/zk-rolling-upgrade-test)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:20 PM Enrico Olivelli <
>>>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This is a release candidate for 3.6.1.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It is a bugfix release and it introduces a few bugfixes and new
>>>>>> features
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> these areas:
>>>>>>>> - compatibility with applications built against 3.5 client
>>>> libraries
>>>>>>>> (restored a few non public APIs)
>>>>>>>> - update Netty to 4.1.48.Final
>>>>>>>> - ability to pass configuration as file in zkCli for TLS config
>>>>>>>> - Add setKeepAlive support for NIOServerCnxn
>>>>>>>> - Fix server side request throttling
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The full release notes is available at:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12346764
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by April 14th 2020, 23:59
>>>> UTC+0.
>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Source files:
>>>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.6.1-candidate-1/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-1058/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.6.1-1
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.6.1-1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
>>>> release:
>>>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The staging version of the website is:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.6.1-candidate-1/website/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Should we release this candidate?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Enrico Olivelli
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to