Hi Huizhi,

I am also looking for this rate quota per client feature. Would you mind
sending again the picture from the Facebook presentation, as I didn't see
that attachment.

Thanks,

Li

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:41 AM Norbert Kalmar <nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Sorry, I missed the point there.
> Unfortunately I don't know the timeline for this feature. Our friends at
> Facebook weren't active lately, but hope you'll get an answer (I see you
> also asked on the jira).
>
> - Norbert
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:33 PM Huizhi Lu <ihuizhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Norbert,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. I understand request throttling was added in the
> > ticket ZOOKEEPER-3243. My understanding is that it's a global request
> > throttling: total requests for all clients. But it is not a per client
> > level throttling.
> >
> > Just realized that the facebook presentation listed the zk ticket:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3467. I think this is
> > what I'm looking for: reads/s and writes/s for per client. The feature
> > is not yet available. I wonder if there is a timeline for it. Thanks!
> >
> >
> > -Huizhi
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 2:20 AM Norbert Kalmar
> > <nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3243
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:19 AM Norbert Kalmar <nkal...@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Huizhi,
> > > >
> > > > You might be looking for ZOOKEEPER-3243, it is available from 3.6.0.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Norbert
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:49 AM Huizhi Lu <h...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hey ZK Experts,
> > > >>
> > > >> I am actively looking into the request throttling/quota feature. I
> > > >> recalled that at the zookeeper meetup, Facebook presented a rate
> quota
> > > >> per client (see attached pic) feature. But I can't find it in any zk
> > > >> doc or code. Is the feature available? If not, is there any reason?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks!
> > > >> -Huizhi
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to