+1 (binding)

I did the following tests for the release candidate:
- verified checksum and gpg signature of the artifacts
- built the source code (incl. the C-client, using -Pfull-build) on Ubuntu
18.04.5 using OpenJDK 8u265, maven 3.6.3 and GCC version 7.5.0
- all the unit tests passed eventually (both Java and C-client)
- also built and executed unit tests for zkpython
- checkstyle and spotbugs passed
- apache-rat passed
- owasp (CVE check) passed
- fatjar built
- executed quick rolling-upgrade tests (using
https://github.com/symat/zk-rolling-upgrade-test):
  - rolling upgrade from 3.5.10 to 3.8.1
  - rolling upgrade from 3.6.4 to 3.8.1
  - rolling upgrade from 3.7.1 to 3.8.1
  - rolling upgrade from 3.8.0 to 3.8.1

Best regards,
Máté

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 6:54 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 - xsums validated, rat ran clean, built/compiled fine and I was able to
> run some manual tests on various cluster sizes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 8:39 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is the second release candidate for 3.8.1.
> >
> > This is a bugfix release. The full release notes is available at:
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12351398&styleName=Html&projectId=12310801
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote by Thursday 26th 2023, 23:59 UTC+0.
> ***
> >
> > Source files:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.8.1-candidate-1/
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-1088/
> >
> > The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.8.1-1
> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.8.1-1
> >
> > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> >
> > The staging version of the website is:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.8.1-candidate-1/website/index.html
> >
> >
> > Should we release this candidate?
> >
> >
> > Enrico Olivelli
> >
>

Reply via email to