I came across the graceful termination patch yesterday. Sounds like important for K8s environments. Enrico, what do you think? Looks like you're not a fan of that.
ZOOKEEPER-4400 Zookeeper not getting Graceful Termination https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1898 Andor On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 08:49 +0200, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno lun 12 giu 2023 alle ore 08:19 Andor Molnar > <an...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > Hi Kezhu, > > > > Sure, I'll take a look at the open PRs before cutting 3.9.0 from > > master. Let's mark these tickets release blockers as you suggested. > > > > Any more blockers of 3.9.0 that anyone knows about? > > No, there are no critical issues at the moment. > > I will double check on compatibility with the latest JDKs, it is > better that when we cut a new major release > it works well with the newer JDKs > > Enrico > > > > Andor > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2023-06-11 at 00:41 +0800, Kezhu Wang wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Sorry for the disruption. > > > > > > I want to ask if there is any possibility for us to include > > > [ZOOKEEPER-4471][1] and [ZOOKEEPER-4472][2] in 3.9.0. > > > > > > ZOOKEEPER-4472 proposed to add `WatcherType.Persistent` and > > > `WatcherType.PersistentRecursive` to remove > > > `AddWatchMode.PERSISTENT` > > > and > > > `AddWatchMode.PERSISTENT_RECURSIVE` respectively. It is a > > > complementary to > > > [ZOOKEEPER-4466][3] which supports multiple different watches on > > > one > > > path > > > and was merged to master one month ago. If we don't get it to > > > 3.9.0, > > > it is > > > probably impossible for us to merge it to patch versions of 3.9 > > > series as > > > it touches both server logic and api side. It might be strange to > > > ship > > > ZOOKEEPER-4466 without ZOOKEEPER-4472, as we are going to support > > > different > > > watcher types on one path in watching but not all of them in > > > removing. > > > > > > ZOOKEEPER-4472 relies on ZOOKEEPER-4471 to deliver comprehensive > > > tests. > > > > > > I have already sent a [review request][3] to the dev mailing > > > list. It > > > has > > > more descriptional information and a real world use case > > > of ZOOKEEPER-4472. > > > > > > Look forward to your feedback in either thread! > > > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4471 > > > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4472 > > > [3]: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/m7gxcffsnjy2lm8g52nssfxb6t800o3r > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > Kezhu Wang > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > Kezhu Wang > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 6:17 PM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > > > > > I can take the master cut next week, but let me put together an > > > > email > > > > about a TLS topic first. I'd like to propose a fix to resolve > > > > the > > > > problem of FIPS (custome trust manager in ZK) and reverse DNS > > > > lookups. > > > > I'd like to include it in 3.9.0 and 3.8.2. > > > > > > > > Andor > > > > > > > > p.s. Whoever is making a change on the webpage, please remove > > > > the > > > > 3.8.0 > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 09:11 +0200, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > > Hello ZooKeepers, > > > > > I think that it is time to do a round of releases. > > > > > > > > > > We should cut a release out of the master branch, 3.9.0 and > > > > > main > > > > > cutting a release out of 3.7.x and 3.8.x would be useful. > > > > > > > > > > Before cutting the release please ensure that third party > > > > > libraries > > > > > are not reported against CVEs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the list of the latest releases > > > > > https://zookeeper.apache.org/releases.html > > > > > > > > > > Would anyone volunteer ? > > > > > > > > > > Enrico
