On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 07:49 +0000, Wu, Hao A wrote: > Hello all, > > For the series: > [PATCH v2 00/10] Duplicate required CSM components for OVMF > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41385 > > I sent it out on May 27th, and did not receive a confirmation from David > for about 2 weeks. I think maybe the CSM support on OVMF is no longer > cared, and thus I sent another series today to drop such support: > [PATCH v1 0/2] OVMF: Drop CSM support > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42142 > > Please help to provide some feedbacks/confirmation on what should I do for > the next step. (This task actually blocks our proposal to remove > IntelFramework[Module]Pkg from edk2.)
Apologies for the delay. It wasn't clear that the first series was actually tested by booting with a CSM, and I was reluctant to ack it without knowing that it didn't cause a regression. This is, of course, complicated by the fact that I can't actually get a CSM boot to complete at the moment. But it gets a long way into the boot process before something goes wrong, so confirmation that it still gets at least that far with your 'Duplicate required CSM components' series would be good. Is there a git tree I can pull from? I seem to recall that last time I spent serious time working on OVMF, life was horribly complicated by CRLF line endings, and it was extremely painful to just apply patches from email... is that still the case? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#42215): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42215 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32011839/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
