On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 11:35, Ooi, Tzy Way <tzy.way....@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Bieshuevel, > > You mentioned that "Are these discrete components? If so, I wonder we should > use some kind of abstraction for the PHY operation". In our system, the MAC > is only connected to this PHY, hence wonder if is it ok to still maintain as > it is for now? >
I think that is ok for now, since it is what all ethernet drivers do. > Also, may I know if you could explain more on what is abstraction for the PHY? > MAC <-> PHY communication uses a standardized programming interface over a standardized bus, so there is bound to be an opportunity for sharing more code between drivers than we do today. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#42884): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42884 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31541649/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
