Hi Dandan,
On 9/18/19 5:05 AM, Dandan Bi wrote:
> For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
> the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
> EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
> This follows UEFI Spec.
>
> But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
> the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
> like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
> EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
>
> This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
> for the callers in UefiBootManagerLib which don't have the policy to defer
> the execution of the image.
>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.w...@intel.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a...@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhichao Gao <zhichao....@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming....@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
> Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan...@intel.com>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c | 9 +++++++++
> .../Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> index 952033fc82..760d7647b8 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmBoot.c
> @@ -1859,10 +1859,19 @@ EfiBootManagerBoot (
> if (FilePath != NULL) {
> FreePool (FilePath);
> }
>
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + //
> + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an
> ImageHandle was created
> + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be
> started right now.
> + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an
> image, we should
> + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> + //
> + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
OK
> + }
> //
> // Report Status Code with the failure status to indicate that the
> failure to load boot option
> //
> BmReportLoadFailure (EFI_SW_DXE_BS_EC_BOOT_OPTION_LOAD_ERROR, Status);
> BootOption->Status = Status;
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> index 07592f8ebd..af47b787d1 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmLoadOption.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> /** @file
> Load option library functions which relate with creating and processing
> load options.
>
> -Copyright (c) 2011 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> +Copyright (c) 2011 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> (C) Copyright 2015-2018 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>
> **/
>
> @@ -1409,10 +1409,19 @@ EfiBootManagerProcessLoadOption (
> FileSize,
> &ImageHandle
> );
> FreePool (FileBuffer);
>
What about:
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> + //
> + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an
> ImageHandle was created
> + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be
> started right now.
> + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an
> image, we should
> + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> + //
> + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> + }
- if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
} else {
> Status = gBS->HandleProtocol (ImageHandle,
> &gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid, (VOID **)&ImageInfo);
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>
> ImageInfo->LoadOptionsSize = LoadOption->OptionalDataSize;
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> index 6b8fb4d924..833e38c6fe 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/BmMisc.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> /** @file
> Misc library functions.
>
> -Copyright (c) 2011 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> +Copyright (c) 2011 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> (C) Copyright 2016 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP<BR>
> SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>
> **/
>
> @@ -491,10 +491,19 @@ EfiBootManagerDispatchDeferredImages (
> ImageDevicePath,
> NULL,
> 0,
> &ImageHandle
> );
> + //
> + // With EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval, the Image was loaded and an
> ImageHandle was created
> + // with a valid EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be
> started right now.
> + // If the caller doesn't have the option to defer the execution of an
> image, we should
> + // unload image for the EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
> + //
> + if (Status == EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION) {
> + gBS->UnloadImage (ImageHandle);
> + }
> if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
Ditto.
The logic is correct, but the code workflow is now odd.
> LoadCount++;
> //
> // Before calling the image, enable the Watchdog Timer for
> // a 5 Minute period
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#47913): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47913
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34184008/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
