> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindh...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:00 PM
> To: Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) <abner.ch...@hpe.com>
> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging/RISC-V-V2 PATCH v2 25/29]
> BaseTools/Scripts
> 
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:31:06AM +0000, Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW
> Technologist) wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf
> > > Of Leif Lindholm
> > > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 4:51 AM
> > > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist)
> > > <abner.ch...@hpe.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging/RISC-V-V2 PATCH v2 25/29]
> > > BaseTools/Scripts
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 08:31:51AM +0800, Abner Chang wrote:
> > > > Add RISC-V specific LD scripts. ."rela(INFO)" in the latest
> > > > GccBase.lds causes PE32 relocation error.
> > > > This is the temporaty solution untill we find the root casue.
> > >
> > > I presume you mean that having a separate version for RISCV is
> > > temporary? I am OK with this for now. However, the diff is not what
> > > I would expect. Can you verify that the difference is only what you
> actually need?
> >
> > Yes. Hope I can remove this change after I figuring out the toolchain issue.
> >
> > > For example:
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Abner Chang <abner.ch...@hpe.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  BaseTools/Scripts/GccBaseRiscV.lds | 66
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 BaseTools/Scripts/GccBaseRiscV.lds
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBaseRiscV.lds
> > > > b/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBaseRiscV.lds
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..7f9fae6
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/BaseTools/Scripts/GccBaseRiscV.lds
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> > > > +/** @file
> > > > +
> > > > +  Unified linker script for GCC based builds
> > > > +
> > > > +  Copyright (c) 2010 - 2015, Intel Corporation. All rights
> > > > + reserved.<BR>  Copyright (c) 2015, Linaro Ltd. All rights
> > > > + reserved.<BR>  Copyright (c) 2019, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
> > > > + Development LP. All rights reserved.<BR>
> > > > +
> > > > +  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> > > > +
> > > > +**/
> > > > +
> > > > +SECTIONS {
> > > > +
> > > > +  /*
> > > > +   * The PE/COFF binary consists of DOS and PE/COFF headers, and
> > > > + a
> > > sequence of
> > > > +   * section headers adding up to PECOFF_HEADER_SIZE bytes (which
> > > differs
> > > > +   * between 32-bit and 64-bit builds). The actual start of the .text
> section
> > > > +   * will be rounded up based on its actual alignment.
> > > > +   */
> > > > +  . = PECOFF_HEADER_SIZE;
> > > > +
> > > > +  .text : ALIGN(CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE)) {
> > > > +    *(.text .text.* .stub .gnu.linkonce.t.*)
> > > > +    *(.rodata .rodata.* .gnu.linkonce.r.*)
> > > > +    *(.got .got.*)
> > > > +
> > > > +    /*
> > > > +     * The contents of AutoGen.c files are constant from the POV
> > > > + of the
> > > program,
> > > > +     * but most of its contents end up in .data or .bss by default 
> > > > since
> few of
> > > > +     * the variable definitions that get emitted are declared as CONST.
> > > > +     */
> > >
> > > The above comment block looks completely different - in GccBase.lds:
> > >      /*
> > >       * The contents of AutoGen.c files are mostly constant from the
> > > POV of the
> > >       * program, but most of it ends up in .data or .bss by default since 
> > > few
> of
> > >       * the variable definitions that get emitted are declared as CONST.
> > >       * Unfortunately, we cannot pull it into the .text section entirely, 
> > > since
> > >       * patchable PCDs are also emitted here, but we can at least
> > > move all of the
> > >       * emitted GUIDs here.
> > >       */
> > >
> > > > +    *:AutoGen.obj(.data.g*Guid)
> > > > +  }
> > > > +
> > > > +  /*
> > > > +   * The alignment of the .data section should be less than or equal to
> the
> > > > +   * alignment of the .text section. This ensures that the relative 
> > > > offset
> > > > +   * between these sections is the same in the ELF and the
> > > > + PE/COFF
> > > versions of
> > > > +   * this binary.
> > > > +   */
> > > > +  .data ALIGN(ALIGNOF(.text)) :
> ALIGN(CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE))
> > > {
> > > > +    *(.data .data.* .gnu.linkonce.d.*)
> > > > +    *(.bss .bss.*)
> > > > +  }
> > > > +
> > > > +  .eh_frame ALIGN(CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE)) : {
> > > > +    KEEP (*(.eh_frame))
> > > > +  }
> > > > +
> > > > +  .rela ALIGN(CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE)) : {
> > >
> > > The above line is, I believe, the only necessary change for your
> workaround?
> >
> > Yes. only this line is necessary. I guess I copied entire lds file from my 
> > old
> edk2 tree.
> 
> Yeah, that makes sense.
> If you can provide an updated version based on the current common .lds, I'm
> OK for that to go into the -staging branch.
It will be in the v3.
> 
> /
>     Leif
> 
> > >
> > > > +    *(.rela .rela.*)
> > > > +  }
> > > > +
> > >
> > > The original one as the following:
> > >   .hii : ALIGN(CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE)) {
> > >     KEEP (*(.hii))
> > >   }
> > >
> > > I do not think including this could be the cause of any issues.
> > >
> > > Also, GccBase.lds includes here:
> > >   /*
> > >    * Retain the GNU build id but in a non-allocatable section so GenFw
> > >    * does not copy it into the PE/COFF image.
> > >    */
> > >   .build-id (INFO) : { *(.note.gnu.build-id) }
> > >
> > > > +  /DISCARD/ : {
> > > > +    *(.note.GNU-stack)
> > > > +    *(.gnu_debuglink)
> > > > +    *(.interp)
> > > > +    *(.dynsym)
> > > > +    *(.dynstr)
> > > > +    *(.dynamic)
> > > > +    *(.hash)
> > >
> > > In GccBase.lds:
> > >        *(.hash .gnu.hash)
> > >
> > > /
> > >     Leif
> > >
> > > > +    *(.comment)
> > > > +    *(COMMON)
> > > > +  }
> > > > +}
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > 
> >

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#49003): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/49003
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/34258223/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to