On 11/14/19 12:46, Zhang, Shenglei wrote:
> From: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zh...@intel.com>
> 
> There are missing strings in MdeModulePkg.uni, NetworkPkg.uni
> and UefiCpuPkg.uni. So add them into uni files.
> 
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.w...@intel.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin...@intel.com>
> Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan...@intel.com>
> Cc: Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rab...@intel.com>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> Shenglei Zhang (3):
>   MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.uni: Add missing strings for PCD
>   NetworkPkg/NetworkPkg.uni: Add missing strings for PCD
>   UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing strings for PCD
> 
>  MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.uni | 12 ++++++++++++
>  NetworkPkg/NetworkPkg.uni     |  7 +++++++
>  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni     | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 

This blurb announces three patches in the series. However, in response to the 
blurb, five patches in total seem to have been posted (and, based on the 
message-id fields in those patch emails, everything was sent out in a single 
git invocation):

[edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/3] MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.uni: Add missing strings for 
PCD
[edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdePkg: Update the comments of IsLanguageSupported
[edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: Update the coding styles
[edk2-devel] [PATCH 2/3] NetworkPkg/NetworkPkg.uni: Add missing strings for PCD
[edk2-devel] [PATCH 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.uni: Add missing strings for PCD

This makes no sense to me. Please either repost the full (5-part) series with 
correct numbering on each patch (including the blurb), or else, please split 
out the un-numbered patches to standalone postings. The decision between both 
options should be based on whether it is logical to collect all five patches 
into a single series, or if it's more logical to post 3 + 1 + 1 patches.

(Note: despite appearances, this problem is *not* inherent to mailing lists -- 
if you submit a github pull request with 5 patches, and it turns out that 2 out 
of 5 are (each) unrelated to anything else, then any reviewer worth their salt 
will request separate PRs for each of those stand-alone patches.)

Thanks
Laszlo


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#50666): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/50666
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/57476153/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to