Not yet, which is also why I’m raising the note ASAP. I’ll respond to the other 
feedback today to get that moving.

- Bret

From: Laszlo Ersek<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 1:46 PM
To: Bret Barkelew<mailto:bret.barke...@microsoft.com>; 
devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; 
liming.gao<mailto:liming....@intel.com>; 
annou...@edk2.groups.io<mailto:annou...@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Leif Lindholm<mailto:l...@nuviainc.com>; 
af...@apple.com<mailto:af...@apple.com>; Kinney, Michael 
D<mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Guptha, Soumya 
K<mailto:soumya.k.gup...@intel.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202008

Hi Bret,

On 08/17/20 20:14, Bret Barkelew wrote:
> I would like Variable Policy to be considered for this feature freeze. I have 
> a couple of documentation things to respond to, but no serious functionality 
> questions (that I know of).

Has review completed on the series (before entering the soft feature
freeze)?

https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftianocore%2Ftianocore.github.io%2Fwiki%2FSoftFeatureFreeze&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cbret.barkelew%40microsoft.com%7C39b20e742dff4f810fa708d842eea26a%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637332939979144622&amp;sdata=%2BsSEmkhvkuzZqSUxNbK9cWWWnweRVmN0SG7HheLAIPc%3D&amp;reserved=0

(Please note that I don't insist on this particular definition of the
SFF; it's what we have modeled on the QEMU soft feature freeze
definition. It's not carved in stone. It's just what we have for now.)

Thanks
Laszlo


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#64335): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64335
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76253625/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to