Laszlo: > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: bounce+27952+64532+4905953+8761...@groups.io > [mailto:bounce+27952+64532+4905953+8761...@groups.io] 代表 Laszlo > Ersek > 发送时间: 2020年8月21日 19:07 > 收件人: Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Leif Lindholm > <l...@nuviainc.com>; af...@apple.com; Kinney, Michael D > <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Guptha, Soumya K > <soumya.k.gup...@intel.com>; Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist) > <abner.ch...@hpe.com>; Vladimir Olovyannikov > <vladimir.olovyanni...@broadcom.com>; Tom Lendacky > <thomas.lenda...@amd.com> > 抄送: devel@edk2.groups.io > 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Patch List for 202008 stable tag > > On 08/20/20 13:30, Gao, Liming wrote: > > Hi Stewards and all: > > I collect current patch lists in devel mail list. Those patch contributors > request to add them for 202008 stable tag. Because we have enter into Soft > Feature Freeze, I want to collect your feedback for them. If any patches are > missing, please reply this mail to add them. > > > > Feature List: > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/63767 [PATCH] > > EmbeddedPkg/libfdt: Add strncmp macro to use AsciiStrnCmp [Liming] This > patch pass code review after Soft Feature Freeze (SFF) starts. According to SFF > definition, it should not be merged for this stable tag. But, the patch submitter > says this patch is important to RISC-V community. To catch it for this stable tag, > Laszlo proposed the solution to defer SFF start day from 2020-08-14 to > 2020-08-21, then hard feature freeze and release date will also defer one > week. Any patches those pass review before new SFF start day can be merged. > @ Stewards, please give your comments to defer this stable tag release by > one week. > > Thank you, very nice summary. > > As stated earlier, I'm OK with 1 week (or even two weeks, if needed) > extension. I invite Andrew, Leif and Mike to comment. > [Liming] I don't see any other urgent request. I think it is enough to defer 1 week for this stable tag. So far, there is objection for this defer. I will send the announcement mail.
> > > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/63348 [PATCH v5 1/1] > > ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand [Liming] This > patch has collected the review comment. New version will be sent. I have no > information how important it is. @Vladimir, does this patch must catch this > stable tag? If yes, can you give the reason? > > This is a feature addition. While it's a super useful feature, it needs to mature > (mainly from the coding style perspective, as I gather). > Posting of new versions and review are on-going. > > Most likely material for the next stable tag. In case we extend the deadlines, > and Maciej and the ShellPkg maintainers approve one of the upcoming > versions until the new SFF, then yes, we can merge that too. > [Liming] So, this is not urgent. Let's defer it to next stable tag. Thanks Liming > > Bug List: > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64383 [PATCH 1/1] > > UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Always initialize the DoDecrement variable [Liming] > This patch has collected the review comment. New version will be sent. > > This is a bugfix. Certainly a build fix on CLANGPDB. I tried to do some > (lightweight) analysis to see whether the bug is a functional one as well (i.e. > whether the bad code path that CLANG warns about can actually occur in > practice), but in the end I didn't want to spend much time on it, as the build > breakage needs to be fixed anyway. > > So, this patch (more precisely, v2 of this patch) would even qualify during the > hard feature freeze (as it's clearly a bugfix). > > > > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/50406 [PATCH 1/1] > > MdePkg/Include: Add missing definitions of SMBIOS type 42h in SmBios.h > [Liming] This patch passed review early. But, it is not merged. I will merge it. > > Right, it was approved on 2019-Nov-18. If it still applies cleanly, it should be > merged, before we enter the Hard Feature Freeze. > > Well... now that I'm writing this, we have already entered the HFF (as planned > originally) and the patch doesn't seem to be upstream yet. So unless we > extend, I don't think this patch qualifies. > > (On the other hand -- it seems like we really should extend.) > > Thanks! > Laszlo > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#64554): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64554 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76340919/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
