HI Laszlo I checked the history. Jiewen replied " [PATCH v3 0/8] Need add a FSP binary measurement" with review-by on V3 patch series in August 15, with comment to rename FvEventLogRecordLib to TcgEventLogRecordLib. Qi sent v4 series in August 17, with only naming change from FvEventLogRecordLib to TcgEventLogRecordLib. Jian replied "[PATCH v3 0/8] Need add a FSP binary measurement" with reviewed-by on V3 patch series in August 18.
So I treat this patch series is qualified to check in (since V4 adopted my comment). But please let me know if there is any misunderstanding. When I am about to merge, I am told that we are in SFF and I cannot check in. According to the plan, I will check in after August 28, which is end of August. It is still OK for me. 2020-08-14 Soft Feature Freeze 2020-08-21 Hard Feature Freeze 2020-08-28 Release But now, if we need delay one week, then the final release data will be September. If I cannot check in now, I will have to check in at September. That is why I said, it impacts me, because of this one week delay. Thank you Yao Jiewen > -----Original Message----- > From: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 5:54 PM > To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; gaoliming > <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; 'Leif Lindholm' <l...@nuviainc.com>; > af...@apple.com; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Guptha, > Soumya K <soumya.k.gup...@intel.com> > Cc: annou...@edk2.groups.io; 'Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW Technologist)' > <abner.ch...@hpe.com>; Zhang, Qi1 <qi1.zh...@intel.com>; > marcello.ba...@9elements.com > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze start date delays to 2020-08-24 > for > edk2-stable202008 > > Hi Jiewen, > > On 08/26/20 03:19, Yao, Jiewen wrote: > > To clarify below: > > I just notice this one week delay. It impacts us. > > > >> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64354 > >> [PATCH v4 0/8] Need add a FSP binary measurement > > > > The SecurityPkg patches have not been approved yet, and Bret and > > Jiewen are still testing / discussing (as far as I understand): > > <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64526>. Material for the next > > tag. > > > > [Jiewen] I think the security pkg is already approved by me and Jian > > (SecurityPkg maintainer) Bret also provides feedback that it looks > > good. > > The series in question has three SecurityPkg patches: > > [PATCH v4 1/8] SecurityPkg/TcgEventLogRecordLib: add new lib for firmware > measurement > [PATCH v4 5/8] SecurityPkg/dsc: add FvEventLogRecordLib > [PATCH v4 7/8] SecurityPkg/Tcg2: handle PRE HASH and LOG ONLY > > As I'm writing this, *none* of the listed patches have any kind of > Reviewed-by or Acked-by, either included in the patches themselves, or > posted in response to them. > > > I request to check in to stable202008, if possible. > > We can do that only if (a) we extend the SFF deadline again, and (b) > each of the SecurityPkg patches receives at least an Acked-by from one > of the SecurityPkg maintainers, until the new deadline. > > I'm certainly not against the idea. I don't mind if the release slips > some more; it's OK to say that we're not ready to release yet. The point > is, as long as we're doing more work for completing the release, we > should prolong the stabilization period as well (opportunity for people > to test). > > Thanks, > Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#64638): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/64638 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76377867/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
