Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 9:52 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Kumar, 
Rahul1 <rahul1.ku...@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: avoid printing debug messages in AP

MpInitLib contains a function MicrocodeDetect() which is called by
all threads as an AP procedure.
Today this function contains below code:

    if (CurrentRevision != LatestRevision) {
      AcquireSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
      DEBUG ((
        EFI_D_ERROR,
        "Updated microcode signature [0x%08x] does not match \
        loaded microcode signature [0x%08x]\n",
        CurrentRevision, LatestRevision
        ));
      ReleaseSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);
    }

When the if-check is passed, the code may call into PEI services:
1. AcquireSpinLock
   When the PcdSpinTimeout is not 0, TimerLib
   GetPerformanceCounterProperties() is called. And some of the
   TimerLib implementations would get the information cached in
   HOB. But AP procedure cannot call PEI services to retrieve the
   HOB list.

2. DEBUG
   Certain DebugLib relies on ReportStatusCode services and the
   ReportStatusCode PPI is retrieved through the PEI services.
   DebugLibSerialPort should be used.
   But when SerialPortLib is implemented to depend on PEI services,
   even using DebugLibSerialPort can still cause AP calls PEI
   services resulting hang.

It causes a lot of debugging effort on the platform side.

There are 2 options to fix the problem:
1. make sure platform DSC chooses the proper DebugLib and set the
   PcdSpinTimeout to 0. So that AcquireSpinLock and DEBUG don't call
   PEI services.
2. remove the AcquireSpinLock and DEBUG call from the procedure.

Option #2 is preferred because it's not practical to ask every
platform DSC to be written properly.

Following option #2, there are two sub-options:
2.A. Just remove the if-check.
2.B. Capture the CurrentRevision and ExpectedRevision in the memory
     for each AP and print them together from BSP.

The patch follows option 2.B.

Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.ku...@intel.com>
---
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c | 11 +----------
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c     | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h     |  1 +
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c 
b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
index 15629591e2..297c2abcd1 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c
@@ -315,17 +315,8 @@ Done:
         MSR_IA32_BIOS_UPDT_TRIG,

         (UINT64) (UINTN) MicrocodeData

         );

-    //

-    // Get and check new microcode signature

-    //

-    CurrentRevision = GetCurrentMicrocodeSignature ();

-    if (CurrentRevision != LatestRevision) {

-      AcquireSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);

-      DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "Updated microcode signature [0x%08x] does not 
match \

-                loaded microcode signature [0x%08x]\n", CurrentRevision, 
LatestRevision));

-      ReleaseSpinLock(&CpuMpData->MpLock);

-    }

   }

+  CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].MicrocodeRevision = 
GetCurrentMicrocodeSignature ();

 }

 

 /**

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c 
b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index 5040053dad..3d945972a0 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -2135,6 +2135,31 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
     }

   }

 

+  //

+  // Dump the microcode revision for each core.

+  //

+  DEBUG_CODE (

+    UINT32 ThreadId;

+    UINT32 ExpectedMicrocodeRevision;

+    CpuInfoInHob = (CPU_INFO_IN_HOB *) (UINTN) CpuMpData->CpuInfoInHob;

+    for (Index = 0; Index < CpuMpData->CpuCount; Index++) {

+      GetProcessorLocationByApicId (CpuInfoInHob[Index].InitialApicId, NULL, 
NULL, &ThreadId);

+      if (ThreadId == 0) {

+        //

+        // MicrocodeDetect() loads microcode in first thread of each core, so,

+        // CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].MicrocodeEntryAddr is initialized only 
for first thread of each core.

+        //

+        ExpectedMicrocodeRevision = 0;

+        if (CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].MicrocodeEntryAddr != 0) {

+          ExpectedMicrocodeRevision = ((CPU_MICROCODE_HEADER 
*)(UINTN)CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].MicrocodeEntryAddr)->UpdateRevision;

+        }

+        DEBUG ((

+          DEBUG_INFO, "CPU[%04d]: Microcode revision = %08x, expected = 
%08x\n",

+          Index, CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].MicrocodeRevision, 
ExpectedMicrocodeRevision

+          ));

+      }

+    }

+  );

   //

   // Initialize global data for MP support

   //

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h 
b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
index 0bd60388b1..66f9eb2304 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ typedef struct {
   UINT32                         ProcessorSignature;

   UINT8                          PlatformId;

   UINT64                         MicrocodeEntryAddr;

+  UINT32                         MicrocodeRevision;

 } CPU_AP_DATA;

 

 //

-- 
2.27.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#72952): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/72952
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81367127/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to