On 03/25/21 04:55, Andrew Fish wrote: > Ray, > > The other option would be to define a Library Class for the AcpiTableDxe > driver to consume and have a NULL version of it in the MdeModulePkg. That > would allow more flexibility? It kind of depends if you want to make the > implementation depend on a HOB or a LibraryClass? It at least gives the non > pure PI implementations more potential options? I’m not sure with the problem > you are trying to solve that helps or hurts, but I though I would throw out > another option. The other advantage about the lib is could let you define the > HOB in another package, if that makes more sense. > > Not trying to slow down the solution, but just giving some other options in > case another partitioning of this problem would be helpful?
I agree this is another option for separating out the HOB consumption logic, in case it is complex or large. Thanks Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#73284): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/73284 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81543419/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
