> Maybe for some context, my main issue at first was that the checks are > all proper runtime checks with no ASSERTs at all, so I got confused how > this situation could happen in a realistic scenario. I needed to trace > the ParseStatus data flow to understand the idea is basically the same > as in the PE library. Code in a way is self-documenting, and this > personally gave me a hard time understanding why it is written this way. > But thanks for clarifying your intention! :)
I assume you are ok with the ParseStatus. I will send new version based on mail discussion. Thanks! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#76323): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/76323 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83277976/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
