Ok thanks, do we need the two steps to migrate FDT modules under OvmfPkg/? 1. One patch set to clone those modules under OvmfPkg/ 2. One patch set of ArmVirtPkg change to use those modules and deletes the ones under ArmVirtPkg/.
Or we just do all at once? I prefer to have two steps. How do you think? Another question, who would like to be the reviewers of OvmfPkg/Fdt/*? Any volunteers from CC list? Thanks Abner > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kra...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 8:19 PM > To: Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org> > Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com>; Chang, Abner (HPS SW/FW > Technologist) <abner.ch...@hpe.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; gaoliming > <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@arm.com>; > Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Leif Lindholm > <l...@nuviainc.com>; Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>; Schaefer, Daniel > <daniel.schae...@hpe.com>; Sunil V L <suni...@ventanamicro.com>; Ard > Biesheuvel <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] RISC-V QEMU virtual package > > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:04:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 13:44, Yao, Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > I think it makes sense to put Fdt to OvmfPkg. I suggest an Fdt folder and > put all things there. > > > > > > I also think we define Fdt feature in > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/Maintainers.txt to add > reviewer there to help review the code. > > > > > > > Agreed. > > Agreeing too. > > take care, > Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#80268): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/80268 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/85405739/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
