> So DXEFV needs more space then. I'm wondering that the size doesn't > change according to the commit message. Looking at the fdf files it > seems PEIFV and DXEFV don't have a fixed size, seems everything is > fine as long as the compressed image fits into FVMAIN_COMPACT. > > take care, > Gerd > DXEFV would indeed need more space, but I recall that in the first version of this patch, Laszlo commented:
> (2) [FD.MEMFD] should immediately benefit from this change, even if > your downstream populates FVMAIN_COMPACT with something else than > PEIFV and DXEFV. First, we're almost out of (uncompressed) DXEFV space > again. > Second, especially the confidential computing technologies have been > gobbling up the nice, low, free space in FD.MEMFD the way a kid with a > sweet tooth empties a cookie jar. This change is already compat > breaking, so I'd like to see *some* proposal (separate patches) for > enlarging *and pushing up* PEIFV and DXEFV. For the latter point, I figured that it might be beneficial to expand FVMAIN_COMPACT as a whole to allow for the possibility of growing either DXEFV _or_ PEIFV, or both. Best, Devon -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#80276): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/80276 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/85345598/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
