thank you, Ray! thank you! Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2021年11月12日，上午11:19，Ni, Ray <[email protected]> 写道： > > Jiewen, > Sure. I am ok with this. > Acked-by: Ray Ni <[email protected]> > It doesn't make the code worse. Dynamic PCD was there already. > > Thanks, > Ray > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 10:29 AM >> To: Brijesh Singh <[email protected]>; Ni, Ray <[email protected]>; >> [email protected] >> Cc: James Bottomley <[email protected]>; Xu, Min M <[email protected]>; >> Tom Lendacky >> <[email protected]>; Justen, Jordan L <[email protected]>; Ard >> Biesheuvel >> <[email protected]>; Erdem Aktas <[email protected]>; Michael >> Roth <[email protected]>; Gerd >> Hoffmann <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D >> <[email protected]>; Liming Gao >> <[email protected]>; Liu, Zhiguang <[email protected]>; Kumar, >> Rahul1 <[email protected]>; Dong, >> Eric <[email protected]> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 20/32] MdePkg: Define ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr >> >> Brijesh and Ray >> I don’t disagree the disadvantage of dynamic PCD. >> However, dynamic PCD is widely used in today's solution. >> >> If developers know clearly when this PCD value is finalized, then it won't >> be a problem. >> >> Otherwise, I prefer we drop the dynamic PCD support in EDKII infrastructure. >> That would be a huge change!!! >> >> Please note this is already *version 12*. We really need move forward. >> I suggest we keep it as is and check in. >> If we find problem later, we can resolve the specific issue. >> >> Thank you >> Yao Jiewen >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Brijesh Singh <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 1:08 AM >>> To: Ni, Ray <[email protected]>; [email protected] >>> Cc: [email protected]; James Bottomley <[email protected]>; Xu, Min M >>> <[email protected]>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; Tom Lendacky >>> <[email protected]>; Justen, Jordan L <[email protected]>; >>> Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>; Erdem Aktas >>> <[email protected]>; Michael Roth <[email protected]>; Gerd >>> Hoffmann <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D >>> <[email protected]>; Liming Gao <[email protected]>; Liu, >>> Zhiguang <[email protected]>; Kumar, Rahul1 <[email protected]>; >>> Dong, Eric <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 20/32] MdePkg: Define >>> ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr >>> >>> Hi Ray, >>> >>>> On 11/11/21 8:00 AM, Ni, Ray wrote: >>>>> I don't prefer to use a dynamic PCD for passing data. >>>>> >>>>> Because developers don't know when this PCD value is finalized (PCD always >>> has a default value). >>>> >>>> If the value is determined in PEI and consumed in DXE, HOB is a better >>>> choice. >>>> If the value is determined in PEI and consumed in PEI, PPI is a better >>>> choice. >>> (you can use PPI depex) >>>> If the value is determined in DXE and consumed in DXE, Protocol is a better >>> choice. (You can use Protocol depex) >>>> >>> >>> I wish you had raised your concerns early to avoid going in this PCD >>> direction. The PCD approach was discussed some time back. Both the >>> SEV-SNP and TDX patches are dependent on it. >>> >>> Having said so, if your preference is not to use the PCD, then it can be >>> done after SNP and TDX patches are merged. >>> >>> Jiewen/Min/Gerd thoughts? >>> >>> thanks >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Brijesh Singh <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 6:15 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Cc: James Bottomley <[email protected]>; Xu, Min M >>> <[email protected]>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; Tom Lendacky >>> <[email protected]>; Justen, Jordan L <[email protected]>; >>> Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>; Erdem Aktas >>> <[email protected]>; Michael Roth <[email protected]>; Gerd >>> Hoffmann <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D >>> <[email protected]>; Liming Gao <[email protected]>; Liu, >>> Zhiguang <[email protected]>; Ni, Ray <[email protected]>; Kumar, Rahul1 >>> <[email protected]>; Dong, Eric <[email protected]>; Brijesh Singh >>> <[email protected]>; Michael Roth <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [PATCH v12 20/32] MdePkg: Define ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr >>>> >>>> BZ: >>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla. >>> tianocore.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D3275&data=04%7C01%7Cbrijesh. >>> singh%40amd.com%7C40483d937fa84cebe69908d9a51b9afd%7C3dd8961fe488 >>> 4e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637722360254370524%7CUnknown%7 >>> CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ >>> XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=EtT7bzDCZxsMA9sTCqISftp62QbezdoSf4k2 >>> eCfZsws%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>>> While initializing APs, the MpInitLib may need to know whether the guest is >>> running with active AMD SEV or Intel TDX memory encryption. >>>> >>>> Add a new ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr PCD that can be used to query the >>> memory encryption attribute. >>>> >>>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Liming Gao <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Zhiguang Liu <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Michael Roth <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Ray Ni <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Rahul Kumar <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Eric Dong <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: James Bottomley <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Min Xu <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Erdem Aktas <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> >>>> Suggested-by: Jiewen Yao <[email protected]> >>>> Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> >>>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> MdePkg/MdePkg.dec | 4 +++ >>>> .../Include/ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 MdePkg/Include/ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr.h >>>> >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/MdePkg.dec b/MdePkg/MdePkg.dec index >>> 8b18415b107a..cd903c35d2ff 100644 >>>> --- a/MdePkg/MdePkg.dec >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/MdePkg.dec >>>> @@ -2396,5 +2396,9 @@ [PcdsFixedAtBuild, PcdsPatchableInModule, >>> PcdsDynamic, PcdsDynamicEx] >>>> # @Prompt FSB Clock. >>>> gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFSBClock|200000000|UINT32|0x0000000c >>>> >>>> + ## This dynamic PCD indicates the memory encryption attribute of the >>>> guest. >>>> + # @Prompt Memory encryption attribute >>>> + >>> gEfiMdePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdConfidentialComputingGuestAttr|0|UINT64|0x >>>> + 0000002e >>>> + >>>> [UserExtensions.TianoCore."ExtraFiles"] >>>> MdePkgExtra.uni >>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr.h >>> b/MdePkg/Include/ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr.h >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 000000000000..495b0df0ac33 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr.h >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ >>>> +/** @file >>>> +Definitions for Confidential Computing Attribute >>>> + >>>> +Copyright (c) 2021 AMD Inc. All rights reserved.<BR> >>>> +SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent >>>> + >>>> +**/ >>>> + >>>> +#ifndef CONFIDENTIAL_COMPUTING_GUEST_ATTR_H_ >>>> +#define CONFIDENTIAL_COMPUTING_GUEST_ATTR_H_ >>>> + >>>> +typedef enum { >>>> + /* The guest is running with memory encryption disabled. */ >>>> + CCAttrNotEncrypted = 0, >>>> + >>>> + /* The guest is running with AMD SEV memory encryption enabled. */ >>>> + CCAttrAmdSev = 0x100, >>>> + CCAttrAmdSevEs = 0x101, >>>> + CCAttrAmdSevSnp = 0x102, >>>> + >>>> + /* The guest is running with Intel TDX memory encryption enabled. */ >>>> + CCAttrIntelTdx = 0x200, >>>> +} CONFIDENTIAL_COMPUTING_GUEST_ATTR; >>>> + >>>> +#endif >>>> -- >>>> 2.25.1 >>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#83680): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/83680 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/86969144/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
