(Re-adding devel@ since Felix dropped it) On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 8:59 PM Pedro Falcato <pedro.falc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just want to note that if we want to go ahead with fuzzing (I detailed a > possible plan to do so in the mailing list a month or so ago) we will > definitely need somewhere to run fuzzing (even if it's Google's syzbot). > Getting somewhere where we can run static analysis, fuzzing just makes > sense IMO (hell, who knows, maybe even CI or something like Gerrit for > mailing list-less code reviews). > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 7:43 PM Felix Polyudov via groups.io <felixp= > ami....@groups.io> wrote: > >> Yes, LLVM/CLANG Static Analyzer is another possibility. I've mentioned it >> in the first version of the RFC. >> CodeChecker (https://codechecker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) is an open >> source front-end for the scan-build and clang-tidy. >> It simplifies analyzer configuration and provides web-based report >> storage. However, it has to be hosted somewhere. >> If somebody has an idea on how edk2 community can host the CodeChecker, >> that's definitely an option to consider. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Pedro Falcato > -- Pedro Falcato -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#90521): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/90521 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/91737265/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
