Okay. I'll rework the patch series to only delete GCC48 and keep GCC49 and GCC5.

--

Rebecca Cran


On 4/3/23 7:31 PM, gaoliming wrote:
Rebecca:
   There are more discussion on GCC49 tool chain. So, I think it is the safe 
way to keep GCC49 and GCC5 now. We can make the changes for other tool chains 
first.

Thanks
Liming
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Rebecca Cran <rebe...@bsdio.com>
发送时间: 2023年4月3日 5:51
收件人: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falc...@gmail.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
抄送: gaoliming <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Oliver Smith-Denny
<o...@smith-denny.com>; Guomin Jiang <guomin.ji...@intel.com>; Xiaoyu
Lu <xiaoyu1...@intel.com>; Jian J Wang <jian.j.w...@intel.com>; Jiewen Yao
<jiewen....@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>;
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann
<kra...@redhat.com>; Bob Feng <bob.c.f...@intel.com>; Andrew Fish
<af...@apple.com>; Leif Lindholm <quic_llind...@quicinc.com>; Michael D
Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
主题: Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13]
BaseTools,CryptoPkg,MdePkg,OvmfPkg: Delete
CLANG35,CLANG38,GCC48,GCC49, rename GCC5 to GCC, update
CLANGDWARF, delete VS 2008-2013, EBC

On 4/2/23 12:38 PM, Pedro Falcato wrote:
As expressed off-list on UEFI talkbox, I like GCCNOLTO, but I would
rather keep GCC5 as GCC5, for the next future iteration of "lets bump
a new toolchain because we need feature X".
Given we've gone from GCC 5 through 12 with no new toolchains, I'd
prefer to just have GCC.

This is unsurprising, plenty of NOLTO build breakage. Since no one
seems to use this, could we think about axing this or?

Just seems silly to have an extra toolchain (with extra cognitive
overhead for anyone looking at tools_def) for s/-flto//g
Since Liming wants to keep it, let's make all the other changes
(deleting VS 2008-2013, CLANG35, CLANG38 etc.) and keep GCCNOLTO and
GCC
for now. If nobody fixes the problems with GCCNOLTO, maybe we can
revisit dropping it in a few months?


--

Rebecca Cran




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#102496): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102496
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98051589/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to