On 03/05/2023 08:19, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
OVMF can't guarantee that the ASSERT() doesn't happen.  Misbehaving
EFI applications can trigger this.  So log a warning instead and try
to continue.

Reproducer: Fetch windows 11 22H2 iso image, boot it in qemu with OVMF.

Traced to BootServices->Stall() being called with IPL=TPL_HIGH_LEVEL
and Interrupts /enabled/ while windows is booting.

Cc: Michael Brown <mc...@ipxe.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
---
  OvmfPkg/Library/NestedInterruptTplLib/Tpl.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/NestedInterruptTplLib/Tpl.c 
b/OvmfPkg/Library/NestedInterruptTplLib/Tpl.c
index e19d98878eb7..fdd7d15c4ba8 100644
--- a/OvmfPkg/Library/NestedInterruptTplLib/Tpl.c
+++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/NestedInterruptTplLib/Tpl.c
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ NestedInterruptRaiseTPL (
    //
    ASSERT (GetInterruptState () == FALSE);
    InterruptedTPL = gBS->RaiseTPL (TPL_HIGH_LEVEL);
-  ASSERT (InterruptedTPL < TPL_HIGH_LEVEL);
+  if (InterruptedTPL >= TPL_HIGH_LEVEL) {
+    DEBUG ((DEBUG_WARN, "%a: Called at IPL %d\n", __func__, InterruptedTPL));
+  }
return InterruptedTPL;
  }

While https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189136 continues to track the underlying Windows bug that leads to this assertion being triggered: I suspect that this patch will allow people to boot these buggy versions of Windows in OVMF, and I don't think it will make things any worse.

I would probably suggest changing DEBUG_WARN to DEBUG_ERROR since this represents a serious invariant violation being detected. With that change:

  Reviewed-by: Michael Brown <mc...@ipxe.org>

Thanks,

Michael



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#104134): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/104134
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98656860/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to