> As long as edk2 (core modules) will continue supporting IA32X64 firmware > platforms, I think keeping OVMF IA32X64 is useful, minimally as a test > bed for those core modules / PCDs / boot paths. If it becomes difficult > / costly to maintain OVMF IA32X64, then removing it might make sense at > some point, but I don't think it's time for that already.
Agree. > > So right now I'd just consider "shifting emphasis" from OVMF IA32X64 to > OVMF X64. > > And of course this is just my opinion. > > Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#105163): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/105163 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/99062463/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/9847357/21656/1706620634/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
