Hello Jeshua,
just a few NITs:
On 10/2/23 23:52, Jeshua Smith wrote:
AmlCodeGenRdQWordMemory's and AmlCodeGenRdDWordMemory's Cacheable
and MemoryRangeType parameters treat specific values as having
specific meanings. This change adds enums to map those meanings to their
corresponding values.
Signed-off-by: Jeshua Smith <jesh...@nvidia.com>
---
.../Include/Library/AmlLib/AmlLib.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
.../AcpiSsdtPcieLibArm/SsdtPcieGenerator.c | 12 +++----
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/DynamicTablesPkg/Include/Library/AmlLib/AmlLib.h
b/DynamicTablesPkg/Include/Library/AmlLib/AmlLib.h
index 510c79a399..6a273059fb 100644
--- a/DynamicTablesPkg/Include/Library/AmlLib/AmlLib.h
+++ b/DynamicTablesPkg/Include/Library/AmlLib/AmlLib.h
@@ -59,6 +59,39 @@ typedef void *AML_DATA_NODE_HANDLE;
#endif // AML_HANDLE
+/** Cacheable parameter values
+
+ Possible values are:
+ 0-The memory is non-cacheable
+ 1-The memory is cacheable
+ 2-The memory is cacheable and supports
+ write combining
+ 3-The memory is cacheable and prefetchable
Is it possible add a reference to ACPI 6.5, s6.4.3.5.5 "Resource Type
Specific Flags" for future reference ? Same comment for the other enum.
+
+**/
+typedef enum {
+ AML_MEMORY_NONCACHEABLE = 0,
+ AML_MEMORY_CACHEABLE = 1,
+ AML_MEMORY_CACHEABLE_WC = 2,
+ AML_MEMORY_CACHEABLE_PF = 3
Just for a matter of unification in the package, is is possible to
use camelcase enum names, like AmlMemoryNonCacheable ?
Also would it be possible to add a AmlMemoryMax enum at the end ?
Same comment for the other enum.
+} AML_MEMORY_CACHEABILITY;
+
+/** MemoryRangeType parameter values
+
+ Possible values are:
+ 0-AddressRangeMemory
+ 1-AddressRangeReserved
+ 2-AddressRangeACPI
+ 3-AddressRangeNVS
+
+**/
+typedef enum {
+ AML_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_MEMORY = 0,
+ AML_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_RESERVED = 1,
+ AML_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_ACPI = 2,
+ AML_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_NVS = 3
+} AML_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE;
+
/** Parse the definition block.
The function parses the whole AML blob. It starts with the ACPI DSDT/SSDT
diff --git
a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtPcieLibArm/SsdtPcieGenerator.c
b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtPcieLibArm/SsdtPcieGenerator.c
index 9ddaddc198..7df7117352 100644
--- a/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtPcieLibArm/SsdtPcieGenerator.c
+++ b/DynamicTablesPkg/Library/Acpi/Arm/AcpiSsdtPcieLibArm/SsdtPcieGenerator.c
Is is possible to modify the definition/declaration of the modified functions
to use the newly created type ?
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ GeneratePciCrs (
IsPosDecode,
TRUE,
TRUE,
- TRUE,
+ AML_MEMORY_CACHEABLE,
TRUE,
0,
AddrMapInfo->PciAddress,
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ GeneratePciCrs (
AddrMapInfo->AddressSize,
0,
NULL,
- 0,
+ AML_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_MEMORY,
TRUE,
CrsNode,
NULL
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ GeneratePciCrs (
IsPosDecode,
TRUE,
TRUE,
- TRUE,
+ AML_MEMORY_CACHEABLE,
TRUE,
0,
AddrMapInfo->PciAddress,
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ GeneratePciCrs (
AddrMapInfo->AddressSize,
0,
NULL,
- 0,
+ AML_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_MEMORY,
TRUE,
CrsNode,
NULL
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ ReserveEcamSpace (
TRUE,
TRUE,
TRUE,
- FALSE, // non-cacheable
+ AML_MEMORY_NONCACHEABLE,
TRUE,
0,
AddressMinimum,
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ ReserveEcamSpace (
AddressMaximum - AddressMinimum + 1,
0,
NULL,
- 0,
+ AML_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_MEMORY,
TRUE,
CrsNode,
NULL
Regards,
Pierre
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#109275): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/109275
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/101722936/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-