Thank you all! > -----Original Message----- > From: Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2023 8:59 AM > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn > Cc: quic_llind...@quicinc.com; ngomp...@gmail.com; Michael Kinney > <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Jeremy Linton > <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>; Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie>; Daniel P . Berrangé > <berra...@redhat.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>; Samer El-Haj- > Mahmoud <samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: > Signal ReadyToBoot on platform recovery > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 14:00, gaoliming via groups.io > <gaoliming=byosoft.com...@groups.io> wrote: > > > > Yes. The latest spec has clarified this behavior. So, this change is OK. > > Reviewed- > by: Liming Gao <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn> > > > > Merged as #5165 > > Thanks all > > > > -----邮件原件----- > > > 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> 代表 Leif Lindholm > > > 发送时间: 2023年12月19日 19:51 > > > 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; a...@kernel.org > > > 抄送: ngomp...@gmail.com; Liming Gao (Byosoft address) > > > <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Michael Kinney > <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; > > > Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>; > > > Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie>; Daniel P . Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>; > > > Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>; Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud > > > <samer.el-haj-mahm...@arm.com> > > > 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] MdeModulePkg/UefiBootManagerLib: > > > Signal ReadyToBoot on platform recovery > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 22:55:21 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > Same question again. Could we please make some progress on this? > > > > > > > > Full thread here: > > > > > > > https://openfw.io/edk2-devel/20231031173700.647004-1- > ngompa@fedorap > > > roject.org/ > > > > > > > > If nobody objects, I will assume that the change is acceptable and > > > > merge it by the end of the week. > > > > > > I'm OK with this. > > > > > > The last comment from Liming in > > > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2831 > > > was that the fix could be merged after "the next UEFI is published", > > > which it was - in August 2022. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <quic_llind...@quicinc.com> > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Leif > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 09:11, Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > (cc Mike, Leif) > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 08:40, Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > (cc Liming) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 05:48, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 6:36 PM Neal Gompa > <ngomp...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 6:35 AM Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/31/23 23:27, Jeremy Linton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 10/31/23 12:37, Neal Gompa via groups.io wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> From: Neal Gompa <ngo...@fedoraproject.org> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Currently, the ReadyToBoot event is only signaled when a > formal > > > Boot > > > > > > > > > >> Manager option is executed (in BmBoot.c -> > > > EfiBootManagerBoot ()). > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> However, the introduction of Platform Recovery in UEFI 2.5 > > > makes it > > > > > > > > > >> necessary to signal ReadyToBoot when a Platform Recovery > > > boot loader > > > > > > > > > >> runs because otherwise it may lead to the execution of a > > > > > > > > > >> boot > > > loader > > > > > > > > > >> that has similar requirements to a regular one that is not > > > launched > > > > > > > > > >> as a Boot Manager option. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> This is especially critical to ensuring that the graphical > > > > > > > > > >> console > > > > > > > > > >> is actually usable during platform recovery, as some > > > > > > > > > >> platforms > > > do > > > > > > > > > >> rely on the ConsolePrefDxe driver, which only performs > > > > > > > > > >> console > > > > > > > > > >> initialization after ReadyToBoot is triggered. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> This patch fixes that behavior by calling > > > EfiSignalEventReadyToBoot () > > > > > > > > > >> in EfiBootManagerProcessLoadOption () when invoking > platform > > > recovery, > > > > > > > > > >> which is the function that sets up the platform recovery > > > > > > > > > >> boot > > > process. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> The expected behavior has been clarified in the UEFI 2.10 > > > specification > > > > > > > > > >> to explicitly indicate this behavior is required for > > > > > > > > > >> correct > > > operation. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> This is a rebased version of the patch originally written > > > > > > > > > >> by Pete > > > Batard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Took me a bit to swap in that whole conversation again, and > > > recheck the > > > > > > > > > > spec's and code paths, but this all looks fine to me and > > > > > > > > > > should > > > allow > > > > > > > > > > the PFTF build to drop the similar patch from Pete that has > > > > > > > > > > been > > > carried > > > > > > > > > > downstream for the past couple years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As for testing the previous patch has been in the field for > > > > > > > > > > a > couple > > > > > > > > > > years now and i'm not aware of it causing any issues. The > > > additional > > > > > > > > > > restriction of limiting it to platform recovery logically > > > > > > > > > > makes > > > sense, > > > > > > > > > > and as far as I can see shouldn't cause any problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a PS: I also went to check the ready to boot behavior for > > > OsRecovery > > > > > > > > > > and realized that apparently none of that support was ever > > > merged? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What else is there, outside of this patch, in need of > > > > > > > > > upstreaming? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That seems a bit of an oversight since its been in the spec > > > > > > > > > > for a > > > few years now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "ready-to-boot for OsRecovery" is new in UEFI 2.10 (according > > > > > > > > > to > > > the > > > > > > > > > commit message), which is quite recent ("Aug 29, 2022"). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I couldn't find the Mantis ticket in the Revision History > > > > > > > > > (for 2.10) > > > though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anything else holding up committing this patch? Jeremy > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > you reviewed it earlier in the month... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friendly ping again? It's been a month now... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apologies for the delay - Liming, can we progress with this? > > > > > > > > > > Can we please make some progress with this? This has been in limbo for > > > > > far too long. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#112731): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/112731 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103262405/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
