Hello,

I would like to propose that TianoCore move all code review from email
based code reviews to GitHub Pull Requests based code reviews.

The proposed date to switch would be immediately after the next stable
tag which is currently scheduled for May 24, 2024.

Updates to the following Wiki page would be required to describe the 
required process when using GitHub Pull Requests for all code review
related activity.

    
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Development-Process

A couple examples of the changes that would need to be documented are:

* All contributors, maintainers, and reviewers must have GitHub IDs.
* The commit message would no longer require Cc:, Reviewed-by:, Acked-by:
  or Tested-by: tags.  The only required tag would be Signed-off-by.
* The Pull Request submitter is required to invite the required
  maintainers and reviewers to the pull request. This is the same 
  set of maintainers and reviewers that are required to be listed in
  Cc: tags in today's process.
* Maintainers are responsible for verifying that all conversations in
  the code review are resolved and that all review approvals from the
  required set of maintainers are present before setting the 'push' label.


Please provide feedback
1) If you are not in favor of this change.
2) If you are not in favor of the proposed date of this change.
3) On the process changes you would like to see documented in the Wiki
   pages related to using GitHub Pull Request based code reviews.

There is some prototype work to automate/simplify some of the PR based
code review process steps. Those could be added over time as resources
are available to finish and support them. 

Best regards,

Mike


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#118468): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118468
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105847510/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to