Re: UDH length in 1.1.5 Version

[Bruno David Rodrigues]

shouldn't "11" should be 11 in hex ? 0B 05 04 ....   ----- Original Message ----- From: Venugopal Panchamukhi To: Andreas Fink ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:59 AM Subject: Re: UDH length in 1.1.5 Version Our UDH header is like the following : 11 05 04 xx xx 00 00 00 03 ref {no of fragments} {seq no of the fragment} where xx xx is the port       no of fragments : is the max number of fragments