Hi List Does anybody have a Wavecom 1200 series they can send me? I lost my own.
Best regards, Jacob Vennervald > -----Original Message----- > From: Angel Fradejas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18. april 2002 13:47 > To: Stipe Tolj; Oded Arbel > Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail) > Subject: RE: Reporting the number of message parts sent for long > messages. > > > Like Oded, our applications don't send SM to multiple > receivers, but adding > that information seems the right thing to do. > > My vote is +1 > > > Angel Fradejas > Mediafusión España, S.A. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.mediafusion.es > Tel. +34 91 252 32 00 > Fax +34 91 572 27 08 > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En > nombre de Stipe Tolj > Enviado el: jueves 18 de abril de 2002 13:41 > Para: Oded Arbel > CC: Kannel-devel (E-mail) > Asunto: Re: Reporting the number of message parts sent for long > messages. > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > I didn't like the fact that you removed the reporting from > the 'error' > > section in smsbox_req_handle - correct me if I'm wrong, but > this way, if > > a split message is sent to multiple receivers, and some of > them fail, > > the calling application can't tell how many messages were > sent to the > > receivers that didn't fail. or at least, that is my > understanding of the > > code. > > you're right. Any votes for adding the SMS split information even if > some of the multi-requests fail? > > I'm +0 for this. > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Münsterstr. 248 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > wapme.net - wherever you are > > >
