Alex Judd wrote: > > I'm doing some fairly heavy work on the smsc_smpp.c driver at the moment > to ramp it up a bit and I've got a couple of questions re: the esm_class > values that the code currently thinks are DLR reports. > > The current code checks for 0x02 and 0x04 as DLR reports, however the 3_4 > SMPP standard says that bits 1-0 are ignored, and that valid DLR values > are 0x04 for for receipts and 0x08 and 0x10 for acknowledgments. > > Anyone know why we check for 0x02?
Andreas Fink may be a good candidate to answer this, Andreas? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
