thanks, but still the sending problem. also tried leaving the transceiver mode in with an empty system type, but same thing.
the SMSC guys told us to use transceiver mode so i think that part is correct. thanks for your help, nick On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 17:58, Alex Judd wrote: > Try leaving the system type empty and removing the transceiver-mode line. > > Alex > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Nicholas Rahn > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:32 PM > Subject: SMPP usage problem > > > hi, > > we are trying to get an smpp (3.4) connection up and running with kannel, but are > having a few problems. > > we are able to login correctly, send and receive the "enquire_link" packets and > receive SMS. however, we are not able to send messages using the sendsms interface. > > when we send via the sendsms interface, this is the log output... > > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [2] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [3] INFO: smsbox: Got HTTP request </cgi-bin/sendsms> from > <127.0.0.1> > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [3] INFO: sendsms used by <smppTest> > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [3] INFO: sendsms sender:<smppTest:111> (127.0.0.1) > to:<+417xxxxxxxx> msg:<My test message!> > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [3] INFO: send-sms request smsc id ignored, as smsc id forced > to smppTest > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [3] DEBUG: message length 16, sending 1 messages > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [3] DEBUG: Status: 202 Answer: <Sent.> > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [42] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [3] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x80b1af8. > 2003-03-13 17:26:55 [3] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. > > and that's it. the bearerbox never seems to do anything with it. > > here's our config: > > group = smsc > smsc = smpp > smsc-id = smppTest > host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > port = xxxx > smsc-username = xxx > smsc-password = xxxxxxxx > transceiver-mode = true > system-type = "VMA" > allowed-smsc-id = smppTest > address-range = "" > > anyone have any ideas what we might be doing wrong? > > Thanks for any help, > Nick
