Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> oops, that was wrong :(
>
> here is the possible solution:
> static void delete_threadinfo(void)
> {
> struct threadinfo *threadinfo;
>
> threadinfo = getthreadinfo();
> list_destroy(threadinfo->joiners, NULL);
> close(threadinfo->wakefd_recv);
> close(threadinfo->wakefd_send);
> THREAD(threadinfo->number) = NULL;
> active_threads--;
> if (threadinfo->number < next_threadnumber)
> next_threadnumber = threadinfo->number;
> gw_assert(threadinfo != &mainthread);
> gw_free(threadinfo);
> }
>
> next_threadnumber is always the min. free slot number.
> worst case while creating new thread:
> next_threadnumber is used then max MAX_THREATABLE_SIZE-next_threadnumber
> loop.
to be honest I'm a bit concerned in too drastically change things
inside our thread handling.
I'll rather pick the easier and secure way here.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are
