The same problem I also observed
from one of my network operator and *interestingly* the operator was on SMPP.
But I couldn't find any source of confusion in SMPP docs regarding the same. But
seeing so many providers doing the same mistake(???), are we sure?
SMPP specs are very clear in
suggesting that a deliver receipt format (Appendix B : Delivery Receipt Format)
should contain id in C-Octet String in *decimal* format but same is not true
when they specify message id in Submit Response. What is clearly stated is: "
message_id is set according to SMSC
implementation." Also there's difference in the octet size of message_id
in submit_sm_resp(65 Octets) and delivery receipt (10 octets).
Don't take me wrong, am not
supporting those SMPP providers but nevertheless I have introduced a
configuration parameter in my Kannel code to *support* such providers
;)
regards,
JS
|
- Re: [-] Re: non standard message_id breaks D... David Tully
- Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR Nisan Bloch
- Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR Alexander Malysh
- Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR Nisan Bloch
- Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR Andreas Fink
- Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR Alexander Malysh
- Re: [-] Re: non standard message_id breaks D... David Tully
- Re: [-] Re: non standard message_id breaks D... Andreas Fink
- Re: [-] Re: non standard message_id breaks D... Stipe Tolj
- Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR Edwin Pratomo
- Re: [-] Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR Jeetendra Singh
- Re: [-] Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR David Tully
- Re: non standard message_id breaks DLR Stipe Tolj