Stipe/All
Not having been available for either session so
far, I've missed adding some comments.
I think the only logical approach we have, seeing
as their is
- some confusion over who legally owns
Kannel
- many companies are using it commercially and
- everyone contibutes code based on the 'good for
all' principal
is to modif y the existing BSD style license to be
owned by the KSF.
This gives us the best of both worlds, namely a
legal body to protect the work, and the flexibility to keep working in the way
we all are at present.
If I've missed a point from the iRC sessions,
apologies, however I think we should think long and hard before taking a
different approach
Alex
>Personally I see the Kannel Software Foundation as the better approach.
It can be >a legal entity which then could sue Microsoft for borrowing the
code without >mentioning their product is based on Kannel. Or a common
consensus can override an >individual's veto and resolves issues. > >|right. This is a legatime opinion, let's have this discussed online >|today while the IRC session! |
- [FYI] log of IRC #kannel session Stipe Tolj
- Re: [FYI] log of IRC #kannel session Andreas Fink
- Re: [FYI] log of IRC #kannel session Stipe Tolj
- Re: [FYI] log of IRC #kannel session Andreas Fink
- Alex Judd