Hi, sounds resonable for me... Can you please send clean unified patch against cvs? Thanks... (like: cvs diff -Nau )
On Friday 26 September 2003 00:57, adi wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 07:32:03AM +0700, adi wrote: > > I wonder why should that macro being check on > > url_result_thread(). The existing code would cause > > the message (the response) would never be sent, if > > one enable X-Kannel-DLR-Mask. > > Seems that noone would be interested with question :-) > > Here is my proposed patch for smsbox.c suppose to not > to simply drop the msg with dlr_mask not empty. > > Please comments. > > Regards, > > P.Y. Adi Prasaja -- Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________________ Centrium GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80 Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.centrium.de msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 98063111 ___________________________________________ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
