Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Igor Ivoilov wrote: >> >> > >> > Any suggestions why this would be semantically necessary to log to >> > access-log? >> >> For me access log shows users activity. Even if they are not able to get something >> I have to see what they have tried to access. > > that's the question. > > If you consider the Apache httpd, then you have an access_log and an > error_log. Semantically this "failing" requests in the WAP GW should > be logged to error_log instead of access_log, because they *have not* > accessed anything ;) > > Any comments from the others? Heads up please.
think apache+mod_proxy. you get a 5xx gateway timeout if you can't reach the other server
