Hi list, since the discussion of the binfo field brings this up again. We here at Wapme have been thinking of providing some internal layer in bearerbox to make MT billing possible.
Now, I know that the group has actually refused to handle billing aspects within Kannel itself. Most of use had the intention to let Kannel be the "message transporter" and nothing else. As demands come up here in Germany too, it may be usefull _at least_ to provide an abstraction layer with hooks that _can_ be implemented on an individual basis for the billing data purposes. This may imply actually something like the authentication step within an HTTP server. Hence when an MO is tranmitted by the SMSC, we may assume that the SMSC is not aware of the prepaid balance of the user, and our abstraction layer is in "charge" of checking if the MO SMS is about to be processed/transported. Same for MT (and for premium services). Any comments on this please! Stipe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wapme-systems.de/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2 nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H g2HyLAEKQIp30Q== =aYCI -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
