Martin Lucina wrote:
> 
> I would like to integrate this functionality into the upstream version
> of Kannel. At present the use of charset_gsm_to_latin1 () and
> charset_latin1_to_gsm () is hardcoded in the SMSCs -- would it make
> sense to remove these conversions and convert the message only when it
> is processed by smsbox, based on the setting of an option in the
> configuration file? Is anyone else working on this/interested in such
> functionality?

ok, Kannel assumes that it threads its internal message format in
latin1. This is in some sence a convention. Unfortunatly it may be
desirable, like in your actual case, to preserve the charset (in sense
of the available characters that can be represented by the set).

I'd be +0 in having this "configurable" by config file. Which means
avoiding the automated convertion to latin1 internally.

In any case you can send us a 'diff -u'ed patch and people will have a
review on it and vote if it makes considerable sense.

> Regarding the production status of the current CVS, are there any major
> issues if I were to upgrade a setup using 1.3.1 to CVS? (Aside from
> those already documented, modules getting renamed and so on?). I have
> several SMSC connections, using both UCP and SMPP.

CVS is way more stable and reliable then 1.3.1. 

Stipe

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin)

mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS
OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2
nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT
dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv
bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID
AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl
OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ
K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H
g2HyLAEKQIp30Q==
=aYCI
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

Reply via email to