Yes. And how do you fix bad panics, if Kannel stops running ?
On the other hands, if Kannel goes on normally after a "panic"
you can see there is no reason for it.
I do *not* want to use this option to disable genuine panics,
stemming from misconfiguration. These panics are truly useful,
because they flag configuration errors.
Aarno
On 17.3.2005, at 15:19, Kalle Marjola wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 19:09, "Pommnitz, Jörg" wrote:
But this just confirms what I wrote: such a panic is obviously
inappropriate and should be replaced by a warning. So, I stand by
what I wrote earlier: just audit the panics and make sure Kannel
panics in only *REALLY* hopeless situations. This would IMHO be
the Right Thing (TM) to do.
I fully agree here.
It is so bad that Kannel PANICs when it is not really a PANIC
situation,
but we should not make things worse by allowing it to continue when it
really panics because of some unrecoverable problems
(I recall rising this issue of 'too easily used panics' many months
ago..)
--
&Kalle Marjola ::: Development ::: Helsinki ::: Enpocket
