Hi Davy
Davy Chan wrote:
**>Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:40:58 +0100 **>From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **>To: Davy Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **>CC: devel@kannel.org **>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **> **>Hi Davi, **> **>any patch for this one now? Looking forward to review and commit ;)
Sorry ... was into it full steam and then hit into the wall called wapbox. With most of the other code, -1 = bad. With wapbox code, -2 = bad, -1 = might be bad depending on the current state engine. Am busy now trying to understand the WAP code (gessh...tracing gateway/gw/wap_push_pap_compiler.c for return codes is really painful... Oh look! -2 = bad, don't even have a -1 return, but we check for that return code ... aaaggh!).
Unfortunately, my boss called and reminded me about my other commitments.
So, I don't think I'll be able to post a clean patch until next week at the earliest.
understand. wapbox code is pretty complex to trace. But we'd also accept cleanups for the sms part first. And drop the wap related cleanups afterwards.
Any patch to submit?
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de http://www.wapme-systems.de/ -------------------------------------------------------------------
