Hi, I must confirm that we _need_ to commit the proposed patch either in current or modified behaviour since the bug still remains in current CVS head.
On 3/22/05, Kalle Marjola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:11, Alexander Malysh wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Kalle Marjola wrote: > > > > > Ok, I though over this and a bit updated your patch so that it only > > > waits if there are 'partially handled HTTP request' in the air (i.e. has > > > already sent the message onward to bearerbox but has not yet stored the > > > http client into disctionary). Moreover, the processing time between > > > sending the message to bb and saving the client into dictionary has been > > > minimized.. > > > > why not first put http client into dictionary and then send msg to > > bearerbox? > > > I thought about that and did not do that way because that would overload > several functions with a list of new parameters, > > > -- > &Kalle Marjola ::: Development ::: Helsinki ::: Enpocket > > > -- Dziugas