Yes, you convinced me because of 2 reasons: 1. Provided that the API is not going to change when using dlopen() c.s.
and 2. Your API doesn't stop anybody from patching cfg.def either way ;) (but I will be good :P) Rene Kluwen Chimit -----Original Message----- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 14 juni 2006 1:02 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Kannel Development list Subject: Re: [PATCH] config definition file hooking (for external modules),ie. sqlbox, mbuni, etc. Rene Kluwen wrote: > -1 from me. > > Reason 1: > > Does this mean add-ons need to temporarily use an interim API and switch to > another API when it becomes available? > > Reason 2: > > mBuni, sqlbox require patches to the Kannel sources either way. > It doesn't matter if such patches also patch cfg.def or not. > > Rene Kluwen > Chimit Hi Rene, could I convince/argue you to a +0 at least? I'd like to commit this. Stipe ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
