sandyk007 wrote:
Hi How to use data_sm instead for submit_sm in kannel, replacing submit_sm pdu
with a data_sm pdu,any idea please let me know...RegardsSandesh K
first of all: DO NOT CROSS-POST to both lists, unless you have a GOOD reason! :/
... (like I usually have, just kidding ;)
Now, data_sm for MT delivery to SMSC is no supported within our SMPP client
implementation. It's actually a TODO on my list, but I won't have the time to
dig into it.
Any one volonteering for this one?
The idea may be simple: since data_sm allows a higher paylaod, we would not
split "long messages" to concat chunks and send a bunch of submit_sm PDUs, but a
single data_sm PDU to the SMSC.
Even an "extended version" would "be aware" if the data_sm_resp PDU indicates a
possitive result or not. In case SMSC refuses data_sm (ie. because they don't
allow it or haven't implemented it) we would "fall-back" to submit_sm usage.
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
