Hi All, I found a thread on this from back in Feb 2005 (having received a query from provided now myself) .. last word by Alejandro and a lukewarm (+0 - +1) comment from Stipe about committing if patch provided. I would provide a config patch if anyone would vote in it's favour?
Consider: gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c 875 /* 876 * set the esm_class field 877 * default is store and forward, plus udh and rpi if requested 878 */ 879 pdu->u.submit_sm.esm_class = ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_STORE_AND_FORWARD_MODE; But the 'default' is surely ESM_CLASS_SUBMIT_DEFAULT_SMSC_MODE, no? Cheers, Alan
