Hi, patch as I posted it is indeed not needed. But do we need separate bearerbox connection for every smppbox client ? IMHO, this should be changed, too.
Aarno On 26.10.2011, at 01:06, Alexander Malysh wrote: > Hi, > > seems reasonable for me. Why we need the patch from Aarno then? > > Alex > > Am 21.10.2011 um 22:41 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > >> Yes, opensmppbox opens a separate box connection per connected client. >> >> I've heard before that using system-id is indeed more useful. So if you >> want, go for that by using use-systemid-as-smsboxid or simply set the >> system-type equal to system-id in clients.txt. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of >> Alexander Malysh >> Sent: Thursday, 20 October, 2011 10:05 >> To: Rene Kluwen >> Cc: 'Aarno Syvänen'; devel@kannel.org >> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id >> >> But the box-id is for the whole box connection or does smppbox open extra >> box connection to bearerbox for >> each ESME? >> >> Alex >> >> >> Am 19.10.2011 um 23:22 schrieb Rene Kluwen: >> >>> Because the return messsges should be routed to the original client that >> sent the first message to begin with... >>> >>> >>> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- >>> Van: Alexander Malysh <amal...@kannel.org> >>> Verzonden: woensdag 19 oktober 2011 21:28 >>> Aan: Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> >>> CC: 'Aarno Syvänen' <a...@gni.ch>; devel@kannel.org >>> Onderwerp: Re: Using smppbox id >>> >>> why box-id per client? I meant box-id per smppbox. Why do you want box-id >> per client? >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> Am 19.10.2011 um 21:17 schrieb Rene Kluwen: >>> >>>> So you want a config option for boxc-id per client? >>>> This is the same as configuring a system-type, isn't it? >>>> >>>> I agree, it's a hack. But better than cluttering the config files. >>>> >>>> == Rene >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On >> Behalf >>>> Of Alexander Malysh >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 19:41 >>>> To: Aarno Syvänen >>>> Cc: devel@kannel.org Devel >>>> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> just looked through the source code and I can only agree with Andreas: >>>> system-type has nothing todo with box-id. >>>> I don't know who uses it and why but it's totally wrong. I would just >> remake >>>> this part and make it straight forward >>>> from design and understanding perspective: kill existing box-id hack and >>>> implement clean config options for box-id >>>> and use _only_ these. >>>> >>>> @Aarno: you changed the code for data_sm only, how about submit_sm? >>>> >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> Am 19.10.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Aarno Syvänen: >>>> >>>>> This relies on assumption that no two smppbox share a client. I cannot >>>> accept this. >>>>> Besides, I can have two smppboxes connected to my application >>>>> >>>>> Aarno >>>>> >>>>> On 19.10.2011, at 15:19, Rene Kluwen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Like I said before: In clients.txt, you can put system-type to the >>>>>> opensmppbox-id and you are all set. >>>>>> >>>>>> == Rene >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On >>>> Behalf >>>>>> Of Aarno Syvänen >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 09:35 >>>>>> To: devel@kannel.org Devel >>>>>> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In my case, there is an application between bearerbox and smppbox. >>>>>> Thus application must route to smppbox and not to its clients. >>>>>> >>>>>> Aarno >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 18.10.201 >>> >>> >>> [Het originele bericht is niet volledig opgenomen] >> >> >> > >
