0 is really current time...

I added workaround in SMPP to avoid rejecting...

Alex

Am 23.05.2012 um 16:48 schrieb Andreas Fink:

> is 0 really current time and not 1.1.1970  maybe?
> 
> In that case the SMSC is absolutely right in rejecting a delivery in the past.
> 
> On 23.05.2012, at 16:07, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> 
>> Hi Tanja,
>> 
>> please keep devel@ in CC...
>> 
>> It's not really a BUG of Kannel because in SMPP it's not defined that 
>> schedule_delivery_time should be in the future.
>> Therefore Kannel does what you are asking for, send schedule_delivery_time 
>> with current time.
>> 
>> We can workaround it in kannel BUT it's mostly your bug to sent deferred=0 
>> since you know SMSC doesn't accept it.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>> 
>> P.S. I will fix it in SVN...
>> 
>> Am 23.05.2012 um 15:47 schrieb Tanja Kipreska:
>> 
>>> Hello Alexander,
>>> 
>>> Please find attached requested log(s). I was sending SMS to 38976514008.
>>> 
>>> Meanwhile I was analyzing the code and I believe that changing line no. 963 
>>> in smsc_smpp.c from 
>>> 
>>> if (msg->sms.deferred != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED) {
>>> 
>>> to
>>> 
>>> if ((msg->sms.deferred)&&(msg->sms.deferred != SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED)) {
>>> 
>>> may solve the problem.
>>> 
>>> Looking forward to your answer.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Tanja
>>> 
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Alexander Malysh <amal...@kannel.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> could you please provide debug log for this submit_sm?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alex
>>> 
>>> Am 22.05.2012 um 16:45 schrieb Tanja Kipreska:
>>> 
>>> > Dear All,
>>> >
>>> > I've noticed problem with kannel 1.5.0 when I'm submitting AO-MT sms 
>>> > using cgi-bin/sendsms deferred parameter. Namely, when i put deferred=0 
>>> > in the URL the message is rejected by the SMS center with error "Invalid 
>>> > scheduled delivery time". I'm currently using kannel 1.3.1 in production 
>>> > and have performed the same test and message was accepted and 
>>> > successfully delivered.
>>> >
>>> > Can this be categorized as bug in kannel 1.5.0 and be fixed soon?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks in advance,
>>> > Tanja
>>> >
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <logs.zip>
>> 
> 

Reply via email to