Hi Doug,
I was looking at your posts and went back to your first post to try
understand what does Message splits mean?
Please explain?
Also why do we need unless immediate-sendsms-reply = true and how it
relates to concatenation.
Most Kannel users are forced to manage their concatenated SMSs to prevent
Kannel sending more SMSs/sec than you have set in the kannel configuration.
Does your patch help in that case and enable Kannel to manage the
concatenated SMSs by queuing them without sending more SMSs/sec than you
have set in the kannel configuration?
thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:21:50 +1300
From: Doug Dixon <doug.di...@runthered.com>
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Message splits
Message-ID:
<cac+vp8zgbpoka4rdytpefftwosvdeapzqlwsk0y1hrb0asj...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi all
I find it useful to have the "Message splits" in the sendsms response body.
However, this is not appended in the trunk version of Kannel, unless
immediate-sendsms-reply = true. This has obvious disadvantages (less sanity
checking).
Would the maintainers be receptive to a patch that appends " Message
splits: %d" to the response body when:
concatenation = true
immediate-sendsms-reply = false
Or, if modifying the response body would be considered an unacceptable
compatibility breaker, would an HTTP response header be acceptable?
Thanks
Doug
