Hi Kevin, Please consider breaking this into two solutions, each solution Rene will need to accept on its own merits : 1)First create a patch that enables opensmppbox to work with transceiver binds. 2) Secondly based on the successful acceptance of the first patch, create a new patch that enables opensmppbox to work with separate transmit and receive binds.
Rgds Hillel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:41:56 -0600 From: "Porter, Kelvin" <kelvin.por...@h3net.com> To: "Porter, Kelvin" <kelvin.por...@h3net.com>, "us...@kannel.org" <us...@kannel.org> Cc: "devel@kannel.org" <devel@kannel.org> Subject: RE: SMPP DLR Message-ID: <73e6bc00a0e3dc4fb8b924269261d52d2e061a9...@mail1.hypercube-llc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, Is there a reason that DLRs cannot be received on a separate receiver bind (from the transmitter bind)? Regards, Kelvin R. Porter From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Porter, Kelvin Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 5:16 PM To: us...@kannel.org Cc: devel@kannel.org Subject: RE: SMPP DLR Hi, Yes. Rene is correct. I think that I was misreading the SMPP v3.4 Section 5.2.17 "registered_delivery". If I set the value to 1. Everything appears to work up to a point. I see DLR records created in my bearerbox DLR queue and in my opensmppbox DLR queue. The DLR entries look correct. My next question is about the fact that the DLRs stay in their respective queues. Is that because I have separate transmit and receive binds for my client(s)? Does delivery only occur on transceiver binds? Any pointers are appreciated. Thank you. Regards, Kelvin R. Porter From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Porter, Kelvin Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 3:45 PM To: Rene Kluwen Cc: devel@kannel.org<mailto:devel@kannel.org> Subject: RE: SMPP DLR Hi, Thank you for the corrections. I will investigate further. Regards, Kelvin R. Porter From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:rene.klu...@chimit.nl] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 6:13 AM To: Porter, Kelvin Cc: devel@kannel.org<mailto:devel@kannel.org> Subject: RE: SMPP DLR Your implementation is not correct. Also the original value of 0x1f for registered_delivery is invalid. Setting both the 2 last significant bits is a reserved value and hence not supported. If you follow the smpp specifications, you will get proper results. == Rene [...elided erroneous proposal...] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140304/77c2e0c6/attachm ent-0001.html>