Hi Stipe,

not tested, but looks ok. +1

Alex

P.S. Let’s do a new stable release.

> Am 03.06.2020 um 15:33 schrieb Stipe Tolj <st...@kannel.org 
> <mailto:st...@kannel.org>>:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> at the moment we can define an explicit list of receiver numbers that we want 
> to be re-routed to a connected smsc-id B when receiving an MO on a smsc-id A, 
> but we can't define any number ranges or other patterns of the receiver 
> number.
> 
> Adding now the support for 'reroute-receiver-regex' which allows to define 
> regular expressions instead of explicit receiver numbers only.
> 
> The patchset is pretty straight forward. Please find it attached and feel 
> free to review. I'll commit it to svn trunk in the coming days if there are 
> no objections.
> 
> The diffstat is:
> doc/userguide/userguide.xml |   15 ++++++
> gw/bb_smscconn.c            |   64 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> gw/smscconn.c               |   96 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> gw/smscconn_p.h             |    8 +++
> gwlib/cfg.def               |    1
> 5 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> BTW, I would like to enroll some more changes into the svn trunk soon, which 
> includes mainly the way how "pattern matching" and "message constraint 
> matching" is performed. We have some sweet constructs for this here that we 
> want to get public.
> 
> So this would be a good time to have another round of stable release declared 
> and then go on with the changes/commits to result in a new devel release.
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Stipe Tolj
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
> 
> Kannel Foundation                 tolj.org <http://tolj.org/> system 
> architecture
> http://www.kannel.org/ <http://www.kannel.org/>            
> http://www.tolj.org/ <http://www.tolj.org/>
> 
> st...@kannel.org <mailto:st...@kannel.org>                  s...@tolj.org 
> <mailto:s...@tolj.org>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> <reroute-receiver-regex.diff>

Reply via email to