Ivan Krstić wrote: > Gabor Dolla wrote: > >> - The goal to have an open source solution. If the code will be free and >> available what is the purpose of NDA ? >> > > The meshing code is inextricable from the RTOS currently used, which is > commercial and proprietary. The RTOS is thus delivered as part of the > meshing code for porting, and protecting the RTOS requires an NDA. >
The rtos is threadx ? > >> - Marvell would hand over the full specs of the chip including the radio >> part ? AFAIK usually the radio part is kept as a secret to make >> regulators happy,,, Or the radio part would be in binary format ? >> > > Still being discussed. > > >> - 802.11 b/g is also implemented in software as in recent prism54 chips >> (soft MAC)? The open source solutions should cover that part too ? >> > > Not sure about this bit. Michalis? > > >> - An underlying OS (ticket suggest TinyOS) is really needed ? >> > > Yes. I've recently received the suggestion that eCos, which is GPL'd, > can be used for this purpose. > There is also free rtos - freertos.org Which has a port for arm9 (ports for arm7 as well) already like ecos does but the footprint is a bit smaller than ecos. Gives the choice of pre-emptive and co-operative real time kernels Its available under a modified gpl http://www.freertos.org/a00114.html Alex > >> - 802.11s or batman is preferred ? >> > > We've chosen to go with 802.11s. > > >> - 802.11i is in the scope ? >> > > Not initially, as far as I know. > >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
